Significance of The Near Death
Experiment
People are certainly entitled to ask "So what?", when
told of the Near Death Experiment.
On one hand, those who are familiar with the NDE, either through
reading, knowing an experiant, or having had an NDE themselves,
might regard the whole exercise as an effort to prove something
that is already as well established as the earth being round.
On the other hand, those unfamiliar with the NDE might regard
the experiment with a degree of suspicion, thinking that it is
based on New Age quackery, or the overblown exaggerations of a
few crackpots.
Certainly, as the NDExp team have discovered, for the average
person in the street, the whole concept of "exploring death",
is entirely too confronting. Many think that it is best to "get
on with life" and not worry about something that is going
to happen eventually anyway.
Testing the "Spirit"
Hypothesis
The truth, however, is that while the NDE is an actual common
event that occurs to people who are near death, there is significant
debate as to why it occurs and this is the whole point
behind the NDExp. It is primarily designed to test, in a scientifically
rigorous experiment, a single Hypothesis: That a person does leave
their body at death.
If it can be established that a person who was clinically dead
and shielded from both visual and audile stimuli had knowledge
of what transpired around them, then this would rate as one of
the biggest discoveries of science. At the moment, there is no
experiment that is both reproducible anywhere and can provide
unequivocal evidence of "supernatural" phenomena, let
alone something as specific as life during death.
The experiment is designed so that it is fully reproducible,
and it is in this reproducibility that the Near Death Experiment's
strength lies. If the NDExp team produces positive results, then
any other team in the world should be able to repeat the experiment
and achieve the same results.
Implications for Science
The scientific implications would be huge. While, due to personal
religious beliefs, many scientists undoubtedly already believe
in a non-material, conscious and undetectable entity, or spirit,
they aren't required to include its existence in theories, as
it can't be detected and therefore lies outside the realm of science.
A positive result in the NDExp would tip the applecart and require
that Physicists develop theories to explain the existence of the
"spirit", or "soul".
Social Sciences, such as Psychology and Psychiatry would be
hugely impacted and such a result would require a total rethink
by scientists involved in exploring consciousness and the mind.
The current prevailing paradigm of brain and biologically based
behaviour would require a rethink. While the organic brain clearly
delineates and moderates behaviour, the contradiction between
this and a free and independent "soul" could be greater.
Implications For Religion
Science, by its very nature is open to change, and if a positive
result were produced by the NDExp the scientific community would
(eventually) come to the table and come to terms with its implications.
Religion, on the other hand is an entirely different matter.
Religion, of any stripe, is very attached to its dogmas and assertions
and would actively resist the implications of a positive result
from the NDExp. As researchers have discovered experiants tend
to be spiritual, not religious, so while it is unlikely that the
religious community would deny the result (a positive result would
prove "something" spiritual occurred), it is highly
likely that they would place an entirely different interpretation
on the event from that of the experiant. Indeed, this can already
be seen in the Fundamentalist Christian literature, where the
NDE is portrayed as demonic, evil and bound to set one on the
road to hell.
Ultimately, however, unless a huge number of people start having
NDEs, it is likely that the nature of religious belief will remain
the same. People will still believe what makes sense to them emotionally,
or logically and they will still be able to believe 3 contradictory
things simultaneously!
Implications For Atheists
For the non-religious, non-spiritual population, a positive result
in the NDExp could be explosive. Atheists and agnostics would
be, for the first time, confronted with direct, undeniable, reproducible
evidence of an alternate, spiritual reality. While atheism perfectly
compatible with the NDE, the knowledge of the very real possibility
of the survival of life after death would require a paradigm shift
of biblical proportions. A Damascus moment, if you will.
Implications For Society
Irrespective of the potential changes in belief systems amongst
the people of the world, it is likely that the real impact of
a successful positive result from the NDE would be a more long
term shift in societal values. As many researchers have discovered
the values of the NDE experiant are not generally those of the
society as a whole.
Already people are becoming increasingly interested in applying
the moral and ethical lessons that NDErs have related, in their
everyday lives. For example, Kenneth Ring, the "father"
of scientific NDE research has produced a book in conjunction
with Evelyn Elsaesser Valarino, entitled "Lessons from the
Light: What we can learn from the Near Death Experience".
While this trend would undoubtedly continue a positive result
for the NDExp could only accelerate this process, with we believe
positive results for our global village.
A more extreme phenomena could emerge. The NDExp could potentially
open the way for people to flatline specifically to experience
the NDE and its transformative effects. In fact, given humanity's
propensity for seeking altered states of consiousness and expanded
awareness through activities, such as the taking of drugs, excersise
or mediation, this should almost be a given. This would be the
case, even if the experiment fails to generate postive results,
but the participants still experience Near Death Experiences and
are transformed by them. Assuming appropriate levels of safety,
it is likely that this activity could become common enough to
have an impact on society as NDErs become a significant proportion
of the population. With time, it could easily become the case
that an artificially induced NDE becomes a recognised therapy
for persons suffering psych disorders, or disruptively antisocial
behaviour.
Of course the fact needs to be faced that the NDExp might not
produce a positive result. What then? If this is the case, then
we suspect it will be business as usual for the world. People
will continue to have NDEs and be transformed by the experience.
Skeptics will continue to ignore them, bolstered by our negative
result. Finally, the NDExp team will fade into obscurity, hopefully
regarded as misplaced visionaries, than frootloops on a Quixotic
quest.